Federated Learning in Smart Home Intrusion Detection: Securing the Learning Process with Blockchain
- Aon Alhinah
- Ismail Keshta
Abstract
The rapid expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has fundamentally reshaped traditional homes into highly interconnected smart environments, driving unprecedented convenience while simultaneously exposing critical cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Conventional centralized Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are increasingly inadequate for smart homes, owing to inherent privacy issues, latency, and susceptibility to single points of failure. Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising, privacy-preserving paradigm by enabling collaborative model training without the exchange of raw user data; however, FL remains vulnerable to model poisoning and integrity attacks. This comprehensive review systematically examines the integration of blockchain technology as a means to secure FL-based IDS in smart home contexts. We critically evaluate diverse blockchain frameworks, consensus protocols, and enhancement strategies that underpin the development of trustworthy, transparent, and resilient security architectures. Specifically, the review addresses two core research questions: (1) In what ways are blockchain frameworks and consensus mechanisms leveraged to secure FL-based IDS? and (2) What enhancement techniques and hybrid models are implemented to optimize the performance and efficiency of these integrated systems? Our synthesis reveals that permissioned blockchains—particularly those employing Proof of Authority (PoA) and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) consensus mechanisms—when combined with edge computing and lightweight architectural designs, deliver robust security while meeting the resource constraints characteristic of IoT devices. This technological synergy not only strengthens the resilience of the FL process but also advances the development of next-generation, secure smart home ecosystems.- Full Text:
PDF
- DOI:10.5539/nct.v10n1p1
Journal Metrics
(The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations)
1. Google-based Impact Factor (2021): 0.35
2. h-index (December 2021): 11
3. i10-index (December 2021): 11
4. h5-index (December 2021): N/A
5. h5-median (December 2021): N/A
Index
Contact
- Bruce LeeEditorial Assistant
- nct@ccsenet.org