Staff Perceptions of Obstacles to Quality Management Systems in Low- and High- Performing Hospitals in Jordan


  •  Ashraf A’aqoulah    
  •  Ahmed Kuyini    
  •  Musa Ajlouni    
  •  Naser Saif    
  •  Atef Al-Raoush    

Abstract

Implementing a quality management system (QMS) is important for hospitals to deliver high-quality services. Hospitals in Jordan vary greatly in terms of the quality of their services. This study aimed to explore QMS obstacles in low- and high-performing hospitals in Jordan. The study employed a Mixed Method-Sequential Exploratory design. A questionnaire was used to explore the QMS obstacles. The study population was drawn from six public and private hospitals considered low- and high-performing. A total of 908 participants who worked in the six hospitals completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire contained 23 items and was rated using 5-points Likert Scale. The data was analysed using quantitative tools as Descriptive statistics, General Liner Model (Univariate analysis) to determine the major QMS obstacles in low- and high-performing hospitals and to explore the relationship between participants’ background variables. The study found that low-performing hospitals faced six major obstacles: lack of rewards for hospital staff, inadequate material resources, lack of training programmes in sufficient staff motivation, insufficient budget for a QMS, and inadequate authority delegation. Whereas, the high-performing hospitals faced three major obstacles: lack of rewards for hospital staff, inadequate authority delegation, and shortage of staff. The results showed that there were significant differences between low- and high-performance hospitals in terms of the QMS obstacles. The study also provides recommendations for improving the implementation of QMS in Jordanian hospitals.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • ISSN(Print): 1833-3850
  • ISSN(Online): 1833-8119
  • Started: 2006
  • Frequency: bimonthly

Journal Metrics

IJBM's citation performance is tracked through publicly available scholarly metrics. According to Google Scholar Citations (latest available snapshot):

  • h-index: 176
  • i10-index: 1322

These metrics reflect citations indexed by Google Scholar and are provided for transparency. The journal is not currently indexed in Web of Science or Scopus.

Contact