Implications of Auditor Characteristics and Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance for Going-Concern Audit Opinions: Evidence from Taiwan


  •  Hsiang-Tsai Chiang    
  •  Shu-Lin Lin    
  •  Li-Jen He    

Abstract

This study explores the association among auditor characteristics, directors’ and officers’ (D&O) insurance, and auditors’ intention to issue going-concern opinions. For the insured decision, the results show that clients of auditors with greater market shares, better reputation (Big 4), and those that had been punished had higher D&O insurance coverage. For the results of audit opinion, the results show that the industry-specific experience of auditors and audit firm size are significantly negatively associated with the issuing of going-concern opinion. It is consistent with our expectations that since Big 4 auditors may share more litigation risk and possess more loss coverage of audit failure of D&O insurance, the effects of D&O insurance on auditors’ intention of issuing going-concern opinions are more significant for Big 4 auditors.



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • Issn(Print): 1913-9004
  • Issn(Onlne): 1913-9012
  • Started: 2008
  • Frequency: monthly

Journal Metrics

Google-based Impact Factor (2019): 14.58

h-index (February 2019): 54

i10-index (February 2019): 453

h5-index (February 2019): 26

h5-median(February 2019): 35

( The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )

Contact