The Arbitrary Choice of the Predictor in Meritocratic Selection to Higher Education Affects the Selection Outcomes


  •  Sorel Cahan    
  •  Ronit Nirel    
  •  Eyal Gamliel    

Abstract

Predictive validity considerations in selection dictate choice of the predictor with the highest predictive validity. Implementation of this principle in any specific selection process inevitably entails choice between imperfectly correlated alternative predictors, real or hypothetical, which are equivalent in terms of predictive validity. We show that use of different predictors necessarily results in the admission of partially overlapping groups of candidates. The amount of non-overlap is inversely related to the correlation between predictors and to the selection ratio. For typical values of these factors, the amount of non-overlap is considerable (50%-80%). Thus, the predictor’s identity affects the identity and characteristics of the admitted candidates independently of its validity and can be intentionally used to bias the selection outcomes in a desired direction.



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
  • Issn(Print): 1925-4741
  • Issn(Onlne): 1925-475X
  • Started: 2011
  • Frequency: quarterly

Journal Metrics

Google-based Impact Factor (2018): 9.98

h-index (August 2018): 20

i10-index (August 2018): 60

h5-index (August 2018): 15  

h5-median(August 2018): 20

(The data was calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Click Here to Learn More. )

Contact