What Leads to Evocation of Moral Outrage? Exploring the Role of Personal Morality

Shunsuke Uehara, Tomohiro Nakagawa, Toru Tamura

Abstract


Anger is usually evoked when an individual perceives that his/her moral standard or principle has been violated.
This has been termed as “moral outrage.” However, some researchers have suggested that anger at an immoral
act is personal because increased anger was reported only when harm was undeservedly inflicted upon the self or
an in-group member even if the act was judged to be a moral violation. In this study, on the basis of the
assumption that moral outrage is a conditional emotional reaction that is evoked only in individuals high in
morality, we attempted to examine whether personal morality elicited moral outrage. Japanese participants were
asked to read a fictitious newspaper article describing a case of abduction. The abducted victim was described as
Japanese for half of the participants, and as Slovenian for the other half. Immediately after reading the article,
anger, the perception of the wrongness of the abduction, and personal morality was assessed. We found that
anger was increased only in the Japanese abductee condition, regardless of whether the level of self-reported
morality was low or high. We discuss the possibility that personal anger is an exceedingly prevalent emotion and
the question as to why no evidence of moral outrage was found.

Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.5539/ijps.v6n1p58

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

International Journal of Psychological Studies   ISSN 1918-7211 (Print)   ISSN 1918-722X (Online)

Copyright © Canadian Center of Science and Education

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ccsenet.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.