Government Audit Materiality (Part One): How and Why is It Different from Corporate Audit Materiality – A Theoretical Matrix on Three Materiality Differences and Corresponding Contextual Reasons

Yining Zhou

Abstract


This research is to explore materiality concept in government audit. Based on a case study on a local government audit office, this research discovers that: in judging material information, government audit differs significantly from corporate audit on three aspects, ‘tight materiality thresholds’, ‘focus on qualitative considerations’, and ‘income and expenditure as materiality-focused subjects’. And furthermore, it argues that these sharp differences result from inherent contextual situations in government audit: pressure from public accountability; high auditor status; power in collecting evidence; and public stakeholder interests. The outcome of the research conveys a message: materiality is contextual. It is uneasy, unreasonable and unnecessary to copy directly from corporate materiality models or guidelines to government audit; rather, the study on governmental context itself is necessary and unavoidable in developing government audit materiality guidelines.


Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v4n1p80

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

International Journal of Economics and Finance  ISSN  1916-971X (Print) ISSN  1916-9728 (Online)

Copyright © Canadian Center of Science and Education

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'ccsenet.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.