Role of Organizational Change in Developing Team Performance and Support Positive Work Environment

Current study aimed at examining the influence of organizational change on two of the main aspects of any organization which are team performance and work environment. Study followed the quantitative approach through utilizing the questionnaire as a tool of study. Through applying the questionnaire on a sample of (211) managers from industrial organizations in Jordan; results indicated that there appeared to be a positive influence of organizational change on both team performance and work environment. Through the study, results indicated that technology as a variable of organizational change appeared to be the influential variable on both team performance and work environment which indicated the importance of technology in organizations and how to handle its interference and transition in a positive approach. Based on results, current study recommends enhancing the managerial support within industrial organizations in Jordan as it appeared that there was a lack in the support that management has on managing change. In addition to that, technology appeared to be of high importance, so it is recommended to focus more on technologies and manage the transition from manual to technological approaches within industrial organizations.


Introduction
In a developing world; there appear tins of changes and enhancements that are prepared and utilized in order to develop many aspects of organizational performance and products. Those changes must welcomes by the organization in a way that paves the road for better use and results from these changes. Such changes appear in a form of technological enhancement, theoretical applications and strategies that are meant to enhance the way organizations operate.
This concept is considered to be very important especially for organizations which are working within the manufacturing field. Many scholars have spoken to change management within manufacturing industries around the world (Cottyn et al., 2011;Fok-Yew & Ahmad, 2014;Fok-Yew et al., 2013). Scholars have reached a common result indicating that paying attention to change and managing it in a way that supports its acceptance within the organization is considered to be one of the main aspects that can develop organizational change and elevate to a level which can work on supporting both team performance and work environment.

Background of Industry
The Jordanian industrial sector comprises for the most part of assembling, extractive businesses, electricity and water. These parts are connected in reverse and forward with segments, for example, transportation, insurance, and trade. The industrialsector is a high supporter of Jordan's GDP as it contributed roughly with 24% of total GDP in 2017, it managed to employ over 240,000 individuals, the greater part of them Jordanians (JIC, 2019).
The significance of Jordan's industrial sector is extensive. It represents about 60% of the absolute speculations profiting by the Investment Law and contributes essentially to the quality of the Jordanian Dinar and to the swapping scale's dependability through enhancing the Kingdom's legitimate stores with remote money (with more than US$ 8.0 billion in 2017). In addition, the industrial sector adds to the combination of the monetary steadiness of Jordan by furnishing the treasury with more than JOD 1 billion every year in immediate or aberrant charges, as every Dinar put resources into the business gives the treasury in excess of eight pennies of duty incomes(JIC, 2019).  Grantet al. (2005) stated that in spite of the fact that it exhibits the ideas with regards to a framework execution philosophy; the systems can be connected to different kinds of operational change activities. In framework usage extends, the customary venture group jobs incorporate undertaking administrator, business investigator, software engineer, and other topic specialists. The undertaking group cooperates to guarantee the task is conveyed to meet business necessities and that the specialized prerequisites of the arrangement are met for an effective usage. The OCM exercises might be pushed aside on the grounds that the specialized duties of the venture group don't take into account enough time to guarantee the task is conveyed viably from the human point of view. Amusingly, when fruitless operational change ventures are surveyed, seven out of the main 10 purposes behind disappointment are because of botched authoritative change the executives chances (Mellert et al. 2015).

Team Performance
Performance is comprehended as accomplishment of the association in connection with its set objectives. It incorporates results accomplished, or achieved through commitment of people or groups to the association's vital objectives. The term performance envelops financial just as conduct results. Rajnoha and Lesníková (2016) see performance all the more thoroughly by enveloping practices and results. He is of the view that practices as results in their own right', which can be made a decision about separated from results' (McMahon, 2013). Performance is an effect. The jobs of any oversee can be found in three sections: Being, Doing and Relating.
Being it is worried about the abilities of the deal with that are pertinent to his/her performance. It is readiness of the brain of the administrator. Doing centers around the oversee exercises that are dynamically successful at various dimensions in the association: that influence performance of different jobs subject to the oversee yield, and the hierarchical performance in general. As somebody stated, Ideas are amusing easily overlooked details (Aguinis et al., 2012). They won't work except if you do.'Relating' underlines the idea of associations with individuals from the job organizes vertical, level or something else. Performance has a linkage with the individual potential and how best it is acknowledged by the person (Salem, 2003). With respect to deal with, his/her potential turns into the contribution to the beneficial procedure and performance is the yield. Manager's Potential is resolved when a lot of undertakings are allocated to him. It is additionally identified with performance guidelines set (Bremser and Chung, 2005).
According to Qureshi and Hassan (2013) resistance to change is typical. The fruitful administration of progress is characterized by the capacity of individuals to move towards, and acknowledge, the vision for change. It sounds straightforward. The way in which the terms 'Execution Management' and 'Change Management' are tossed around the workplace nowadays you could be excused for imagining that the procedures have been so all around built up that they are in every case effectively actualized. However, as per New York Times smash hit creator John Kotter, 70% of progress activities in associations and organizations fail.Regardless of whether it is a change the executives' procedure or an act the board procedure, awful usage and execution of any procedure causes worry inside the working environment. Working environment stress is costing the Australian economy in any event $14.81 billion per year -3.2 days a year, per specialist are lost to work environment stress.A incredible arrangement of time and cash has been spent by many research organizations on the best way to actualize viable change the board and how to benefit from worker execution the executives, yet ongoing exploration shows that nor are being executed successfully. As indicated by Ebongkeng (2018), just 8% of organizations report that their execution the board procedure drives elevated amounts of significant worth, while 58 percent said it's anything but a powerful utilization of time.2 What is clear is that the importance of progress the board and execution the executives is diverse to a business and a representative. Except if something is done toward the start of the procedure to bring both the business and the worker closer together, the two gatherings will regularly go down various ways and neglect to land at a similar goal.

Work Environment
Individuals have a common resistance to change and indeed though there are great trade reasons for changing the workplace, frequently, laborers feel defenseless with the process. Consequently, work environment alters administration ought to be executed exceptionally carefully and keenly. The objective is to create a well-crafted program that gives back for employees around their modern work environment and helps them in getting back to work as rapidly as conceivable to maintain a strategic distance from any productivity misfortune. This paper will talk about the significance of workplace alter administration together with fundamental steps to success (Levine, 2015).
Organizational change requires that the management and leaders toprepare individuals for the change in the    Based on table (5), it can be noticed that the mean of statement (Management should be more aware of the role of change in leading an organization) is 4.26. This mean is considered the highest mean. It can be also noticed that the mean of statement (If managed well, organizational change can develop the work environment) (3.74) is considered the lowest mean. The overall mean indicates that respondents have highly positive attitudes toward variables of study which managed to show a high level of awareness among respondents regarding the variables of organizational change, team performance and work environment considering that all statements were answered with a mean above the mean of 3.00.  The Multiple regression analysis was conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.665). The latter value indicates that there was a strong correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.442). That means that 44.2 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variables. Also it was found that the F-value was 40.868,this value is significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 , that means ,Organizational change statically influences team performance H1a: Management support has a positive influence on team performance The simple regression analysis was conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.462). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.214). That means that 21.4 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value is 7.536, this value was significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 that means management support has a positive influence on team performance.

H1: Organizational change positively influences team performance
ijbm.ccsenet.org International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 14, No. 6; H1b: Awareness has a positive influence on team performance The simple regression analysis was conducted to test abovehypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.47). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.221). That means 22.1 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value was7.697, this value was significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 thatmeans,Awareness has a positive influence on team performance H1c: Technology has a positive influence on team performance The simple regression analysis was conducted to test abovehypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.554). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.307). That means that 30.7 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value is 9.618, this value was significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 thatmeans,Technology has a positive influence on team performance.

H1d:
Training and support has a positive influence on team performance  The simple regression analysis was conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.642). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.412). That means that 41.2 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value is 12.11 this value was significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05, that means, Training and support has a positive influence on team performance. The simple regression analysis was conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.699). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.488). That means that 48.8 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the F-value is 49.141 this value is significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 that means, Organizational change positively influences work environment.

H2a
: Management support has a positive influence on work environment ijbm.ccsenet.org International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 14, No. 6; 2019 The simple regression analysis was conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.501). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.251). That means that 25.1 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value is 8.379, this value was significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 that means, management support has a positive influence on work environment.
H2b: Awareness has a positive influence on work environment The simple regression analysis is conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.498). The latter value indicates that there was a correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.248). That means that 24.8 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value is 8.309, this value was significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 , that means ,Awareness has a positive influence on work environment. The simple regression analysis is conducted to test above hypothesis. It is found that the value of R is (0.615). The latter value indicates that there is a strong correlation between the above variables. It was found that the value of R Square was (0.378). That means that 37.8 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value was 11.269 this value is significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 that means, Technology has a positive influence on work environment.

H2d:
Training and Support has a positive influence on work environment The simple regression analysis was conducted to test above hypothesis. It was found that the value of R was (0.653). The latter value indicates that there was a strong correlation between the above variables. It is found that the value of R Square was (0.427). That means that 42.7 % of the change in the dependent variable can be attributed to the independent variable. Also it was found that the t-value is 12.477 this value is significant at the statistical significance level of 0.05 that mean, Training and Support has a positive influence on work environment.  Based on table (36), it can be noticed that there are positive attitudes toward above variables because their means are above mean of the scale (3).

Reliability
The value of Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the instrument was calculated. It is found that alpha was 0.932 which is greater than 0.60. Thus, the instrument is reliable and its internal consistency is high (Sekaran, 2003).

Discussion
Current study aimed at examining influence of organizational change variables (management support, awareness, training and technology) on team performance and work environment. The study employed a quantitative approach in which a questionnaire was distributed on (211) managers within (52) industrial organizations.
Results indicated a positive influence of organizational change on team performance and work environment.
It appeared from analysis that organizational change has a stronger influence on team performance especially in the field of training and support. The results supported the fact that team performance can be developed when there are a space for training and development to bridge the gap in the team's skills and qualifications when supported by the right plan of training leading to better performance and a better change management. Jain (2018) also supported the idea of training as a source to cope with change. He argued that many organizations depend on strategies of change management in order to be more effective and more able to cope with the change that is taking place in the organization and especially the training that employees go through is a way to prep them to be more welcoming and able to adapt to a changing environment especially with developments within the business field.
Technology was also seen to be influential on team performance as a variable of change management. The results indicated that technology can add to the team in terms of abilities and qualification, not to mention its role in developing how the team executes the work within the organization. These results matched what came along with Al-Shamlan and Al-Mudimigh (2011) when they argued that change management and having the ability to cope with change in an organization can ease the process of implementing new technologies and apparatus for the production phase. In addition to that, authors saw that having a well-built infrastructure can prep the environment to be able to digest new types of technologies which might appear through the process of developing and enhancement.
Du Toit (2014) was supportive of technology role within industrial scheme. He argued that generally speaking, the industrial sector is the most influenced sector by technology. This is considered to be a huge change especially that technologies are becoming more and more complicated for this sector which requires intense efforts to accept that change that these technologies can offer. On the same track, Sande et al. (2015) argued that organizational change that can come through implementing new technologies that are based on managerial support and awareness can be very helpful in giving a positive impact of this change, they added that not all change can be seen as a negative change, some changes can be so positive that it influences the performance not only of the team but of the whole organization.
Through the analysis, it also appeared that management support and awareness are influential in the field of change management within the organization as it paves the way for more resilient team and facilities which can be more able to accept change with minimum resistance. Cottyn et al. (2011) highlighted the role of management support in making the organization more welcoming to the change. They argued that accepting change can help the organization develop more solid environment that can increase the performance of individuals in accordance with their increased satisfaction of their work. They also added that the managerial support is the key motivator towards developing a team that is more reliable and able to reach the organizational goals.
As for the influence of organizational change on work environment; results also indicated that organizational change and managing it in a managerial way can help in developing the work environment leading to more coherent team performance. These results matched a study by Ebongkeng (2018) which also supported the fact that managing organizational change in a healthy approach an play a role in defining the level of performance that an organizational can pull, in addition to that, if this change was carried o in a suitable way there could be a chance for better team performance at the micro level and a better organizational performance at the higher level. Nyaungwa et al, (2015) also supported the fact that managing organizational change ina good way can influence the organization on both level (performance and environment). Authors argued that when technologies enters the operational side of an organization is can help in opening the doors for more development, efficiency in performance and a wider space for strategies and plans to face the future. As the same time, authors noted that when the management is supportive enough for this change it can influence how individuals within the organization respond to the change and develop their performance. Hentschel et al (2012) was also in favor of the managerial role in managing change. They argued that only the management can lead the change into a better influence on the organization if the management knew how to handle it and presented it to the individuals in the best way possible. Georgiades (2015) argued that management support is important in organizational change, it can help employees become more and more involved in a way that ease the process of transition for them and develop the way they look at change itself. From that point, Georgiades (2015) supports results of current study referring to change as a good developer for the work environment if the management new how involves the employee in a good way.

Conclusion
According to the results, the Jordanian industrial sector is one of the main sectors that influence the Jordanian GDP. However, this sector is becoming more and complicated with all technologies and apparatus that are interfering with the sector. According to Jordan economic growth plan 2018-2022; Jordan is becoming more dependent on complex technologies and equipment within its industrial sector as a part of becoming more efficient and cost effective. This is considered to be a huge change that managed to influence the performance of the team through giving them time to focus on strategies and plans which enables the organizations to grow and prosper. In addition to that, the managerial support is apparent within the Jordanian industrial sector through the management involvement in many aspects of organization. This can be read as a chance to be more effective in terms of leading and managing through training people to become more efficient and influencing.
Change can come in different shapes and attitudes. It can be a sort of a technological development, it can be a detour in the managerial approach, it may also appear as a set of training courses and developments that support employees or it can appear as a way of thinking that changes the culture of the environment. No matter how change appear, it is change, and it has to be a positive influence on the organizations in order for it to prosper and present the best it can through its performance and environment.

Recommendations
Based on results of study, and looking at the conclusion; current study recommended the following: -Deepen the role of management within Jordanian industrial organizations in order to increase the level of employee involvement through the management and enhance their approach to handle change.
-Run seminars, workshops and courses within organizations in Jordan in order to deepen the employees' understanding of change management and how to handle it in the best way possible.