Morphological Integration of Urdu Loan Words in Pakistani English

Pakistani English is a variety of English language concerning Sentence structure, Morphology, Phonology, Spelling, and Vocabulary. The one semantic element which makes the investigation of Pakistani English additionally fascinating is the Vocabulary. Pakistani English uses many loan words from Urdu language and from other local dialects, which have become an integral part of Pakistani English, and the speakers don't feel odd while using these words. Numerous studies are conducted about Pakistani English Vocabulary, yet a couple manages to deal with morphology. Therefore, this paper intends to explore how Urdu language loan words morphologically integrated into Pakistani English. Also, this paper investigates the elements which affect this morphological integration process. The present study is qualitative and uses a rundown of 50 loan words in the analysis. These words are chosen from the newspaper “The Dawn” since it is the most dispersed English language newspaper in Pakistan. The study also uses Books and Novellas of Pakistani English fiction authors, and concise Oxford English Dictionary, 11th edition for the selection of these loan words. The result of this study will help in understanding and enlightening the morphological integration forms used in Pakistani English. This paper will generate adequate enthusiasm among the researchers to produce new and different studies in other domains of Pakistani English as well.


Introduction
The English language is known as an international language, since this language has attained a position, where it is highlighting many social jobs, which are perceived and recognized by each nation. English language is the language of the whole globe on account of its unnecessary use in communication. This language stretched its wings in different countries of the world, during the time of postcolonial, and human race witnessed the powerful gravity of the English language. As Kachru said that English is no longer the property of British and American; in-fact, it is the language which uses it.  This scenario has made the English language a shared property of the entire world. As, this language is incorporating with different dialects and languages, and the locals began to blend or include their own local language's words in the English language, since than diverse local varieties of the English language are coming into existence. And all of these varieties are special in their particular systems. Pakistani English is one of the broadly used postcolonial variety in the world of English languages. According to Raza, Pakistan is among the list of nations, where English language is spreading quickly. Eighteen million individuals of the overall population of Pakistan are communicating in English, and the figures are rising each day, which makes Pakistan the third biggest English speaking Asian country. (Raza, 2008) asymmetric process. Linguists think integration as a non-productive and non-transformational process. It chiefly centers around dialects. When two dialects interact with one another, their association triggers uneasiness and threat to national identity and issues like linguistics solidarity or corruption. (Fragkopoulou, 2015) In linguistics, integration is a subject of discussion under all domains. Therefore, there are various kinds of integration processes. The present paper considers morphological integration, which makes it obligatory to comprehend the systematic structure of morphology. There are various depictions of morphology, yet these mirror a similar thought as "Morphology is the grammar of words, which includes the formation of words, the structure of words, and relationship between the words". (Audring & Masini, 2018) Also, morphological integration implies "Restructuring the loan words morphology and phonology based on the morphology and phonology of the recipient language". (Campbell, 2004) The past studies uncover that, when dialects interact with different dialects, this interaction prompts changes in the stock of one or either languages. (Matras, 2009) Predominately the beneficiary language uncovers extraordinary and unique features that influence the loan words. The loan word is one of the most used morphological word-formation processes. (Islam, 2011) Campbell characterized loan word as, "A lexical thing, which obtained from a source language, that lexical item is initially not a part of the vocabulary of the beneficiary language; however it received from a source language and turned into a part of the beneficiary language's vocabulary". (Campbell, 2004) The language which donates its words to the other language is known as donor language, and the one which gets new words is known as beneficiary language.
Morphological integration occurs, when speaker of one language tries to speak a different language with influence of his first language. Then, speaker borrows the words from his first language, which he needs to use, in order to fulfill his daily chores, and integrates them in the second language. This fact is relatable to the expansion of Pakistani English vocabulary and also to the other varieties of English language.  This evident diversity makes it so important to understand the morphological information of these emerging varieties of English language. The researcher takes this initiative to investigate Pakistani English and explain the morphological pattern of these integrated loan words.

Research Objectives
The present study has these research objectives: 1. To find out the morphological procedures use in the integration of Urdu loan words in Pakistani English.
2. To highlight the variables, affecting the morphological integration of Urdu loan words in Pakistani English.

Research Questions
The present investigation is addressing the following inquiries: 1. What morphological procedures Pakistani English uses in the integration of Urdu loan words? 2. What are the variables affecting the morphological integration of Urdu loan words in Pakistani English?

Research Gap
There are numerous studies, that discussion about the use of loan words in Pakistani English. However; this fact can't be ignored that not all of the loan words used in Pakistani English precisely in the same way as they did in the source language. In-fact, these words are used in beneficiary language after applying the integration process. Studies are available on morphological integration in Dutch and Arabic languages only; however, in the Pakistani context, there is an absence of adequate and exact studies, which makes this research gap a contextual research gap. Therefore, this research is an attempt to fill this contextual gap by exploring the morphological procedures which are used in the integration of the loan words in Pakistani English context.

Delimitations
There are different types of integration, as mentioned above, but researcher delimited the current study to the morphological integration of loan words, and to the discussion about the elements which are affecting these word formation processes. Due to, the absence of etymological dictionaries and lack of research works, the facts provided in this paper delimited to the available online dictionaries.

Literature Review
"Morphology is the word-grammar. It includes word type, structure, its context, relationships between the words, and the forms in which new and complex words are formed". Depending on these views, the aim of morphological is either to account for all the existing words or any potential words of a language. Hence, morphological integration means "Restructuring the loan words morphology and phonology in the beneficiary language, based on the morphology and phonology of the recipient language". (Audring & Masini, 2018) Many studies stated that, In order to enhance the vocabulary, languages either make up new words by integrating the phonological or morphological structure of the already existing words or by borrowing some words from other languages and integrate them in new structure. In case of Pakistani English, the most noticeable process which is enhancing the Pakistani English dictionary is borrowing. Pakistani English has borrowed a lot of significant and different words from Urdu and other local languages. Other morphological word-formation processes contribute to integrate the vocabulary of Pakistani English, but the contribution made by these word-formation processes cannot be overlooked. These word formation processes are transformation, Semantic move, Maintenance, and many others. (Mehboob &Kortmann, 2004) Baumgardner, Kennedy, andShamim in (1993) presented 54 classifications, in which words are acquired from local languages into the English language. These classifications were edibles, religion, peace, wedding, customs, apparel, artistry, music, and so on.  In the matter of Pakistani English, the vast majority of the loan words have taken from the areas of edibles, dress, religion, government organization, legislative issues, workmanship, custom, and many others. Furthermore, this borrowing has enhanced the Pakistani English lexicon as well as, it has affected the grammar of Pakistani English also. (Baumgardner, 1993) The Urdu language is the national language of Pakistan, and it is vastly affecting the Pakistani English vocabulary. The reason behind this impact is the unusual contact of Urdu language with Pakistani English. Consequently, Pakistani English vocabulary is experiencing the process of Urduization. (Tallat, 2003) Baumgardner observed Pakistani English and derived that a decent number of loan words from Urdu and other provincial dialects has recorded in Pakistani English. Besides this, in word formation-processes, prefixes and suffixes played a beneficial and creative job in enhancing Pakistani English vocabulary.  Kachru stated that South Asian Englishes use hybridized structure in words that emphasizes the novelty and productiveness of south Asian varieties of English. In this hybridization process, one word of local language is joined by the other word of English language, or sometimes one syllable of the local language is combined by the one syllable of the English language, for example, Lathi charge, Rickshaw driver, Tonga driver, police-wala, and so on. (Kachru, 1983) Tallat drew attention to the significant attributes of Pakistani English that when loan words are used in Pakistani English by Pakistani bilingual speakers, they contain their Urdu meanings. (Tallat, 2003) In (1994) Kachru proposed two hypotheses which are the cause of lexical borrowing in languages, and these two hypotheses are deficit hypothesis and dominance hypothesis.
Deficit hypothesis stated that "Borrowing entails linguistics gaps in a language and the prime motivation for borrowing is to alleviate the linguistics deficit, especially in the lexical resources of a language". This theory brought into the light this fact that, speakers of a language borrow a word from another language mainly because they don't have a similar word in their language. The sole reason behind this sort of lexical borrowing is to fill the linguistics gap. Dominance hypothesis stated that "when two cultures come into contact, then direction of culture learning and subsequent word-borrowing will lead from dominant to the subordinate." Speakers do not borrow words to fill the linguistics gap, but to show the novelty of the particular language. (Dashti & Dashti, 2017) On the subject of Pakistani English, it came into notice, that speakers used loanword to fill the semantics gap since they don't have a similar term in the English language. As a result, this lexical acquiring in Pakistani English mainly falls under the category of deficit hypothesis. In (1993) Kennedy did an investigation on "Use of Lexical Terms in crime reporting in Pakistan." He discovered that Pakistani print media uses more nostalgic and agitated words in reporting in comparison to American media. These words have adjusted new meanings, which are specific to the Pakistani context of crime reporting. Besides this, Pakistani print media coined many compound words. These words have no substitutions in American or British English. (Jackson, 1993) Fragkopoulou in (2015) presented a wide range of opinions of different researchers about morphological integration of loan words Bloomfield (1933), Hoffmann (1991), Filipović (1980,1981,1995, Van Marle (1993) and Romaine (2010) stated that morphological integration of the loan words is not a haphazard process, but it is a steady and gradable procedure. In fact this is a process which involves three different degrees of integration. These degrees are total integration, partial integration, and zero integration. (Poplack & Sankoff, 1984) It means, when language loans a word, the degree of morphological integration gives the detail of the diffusion of the words. A borrowed item can be represented in the beneficiary language phonological, morphological, and syntactical system as well (i.e., as code-switches), yet the possibility of recurrence of an item in beneficiary language increased the chances of the high diffusion of that word in the structure of new language (become genuine loanwords). It refers as a graduality assumption. (Poplack & Dion, 2012)

Methodology
The nature of the current study is qualitative and it is a corpus-based study. To find out the answer of the first question, the researcher prepared a sample list of 50 selected loan words for the analysis. For this purpose, the researcher used different sources, like the daily newspaper "The Dawn" of months May and June, books and novellas of Pakistani English fiction authors, and a concise Oxford English dictionary, the eleventh version revised in the year 2006. These fifty loan words divided into four different tables. Table 1 based on the Urdu loan words used in Pakistani English with some changes. This tables composed of 20 words. Table 2 contained of 10 Urdu loan words used in Pakistani English without changes. Table 3 covered 10 Urdu loan words used in international English with changes. Table 4 again covered10 Urdu loan words used in international English without changes.
In order to find the answer of the second question the researcher applied the proposed theory of Kashru's two Hypothesis (Dominance hypothesis & Deficient hypothesis) to know the variables, which are affecting the morphological integration of loan words in Pakistani English.

Analysis and Result
This morphological integration analysis will elevate the following morphological features.
• The etymology of the loan words.
• Type of the morpheme used in changing of the grammatical category of word 1. Melas, this word came in the Urdu language from the Sanskrit language in 1682. This word retained its meaning and grammatical category in the Urdu language. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language. Both languages use this word as a common noun. But in case of pluralization of this word, bound inflectional morpheme /s/ is used at the end of the word to form the plural of this common noun.
The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word, and the level of morphological integration is primary, because, the meaning and grammatical category of the item remain the same with the addition of bound morpheme /s/. This addition just convert singular noun into a plural noun. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
2. Kebabs, this word came in the Urdu language from the Persian language in 1603. The Urdu language uses this word as a noun and adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language. Pakistani English uses it as a noun. In case of pluralization of this word, bound inflectional morpheme /s/ is used at the end of the word to form the plural of this common noun /Kebabs/.

/Kebab+s/=/Kebabs/
The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word, and the level of morphological integration is primary. Because the word retains its meaning and one grammatical category noun, not adjective in Pakistani English. The addition of bound morpheme /s/ does not affect the grammatical category of the word. This addition just convert singular noun into a plural noun. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
3. Majlis, this word came in the Urdu language from the Arabic language in 1602. Like the previous word, the Urdu language uses it as a noun and adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language and uses it as a noun. The plural of this word is formed by adding bound inflectional morpheme /s/ at the end of the word.  Vol. 13, No. 5;2020 The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word, and the level of morphological integration is primary. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
4. Nawab, this word came in the Urdu language from the Arabic language in 1800. The Urdu language uses this word as a noun and adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language and uses it as a noun. The plural of this word is formed by adding bound inflectional morpheme /s/ at the end of the word.
/Nawab+s/=/Nawabs/ The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word, and the level of morphological integration is primary. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficit hypothesis.

Sufism
, this word came in the Urdu language from the Arabic language (Sufi) in 1564. This Urdu language uses this word as a noun. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language.
/Sufi+ism/=/Sufism/ The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. This word uses derivational bound morpheme (ism) in the end, and the level of morphological integration is partial. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
6. Whahabism, this word came in the Urdu language from the Arabic language (Whahabi). The Urdu language uses this word as a noun. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language.
/Whahab+ism/=/Whahabism/ The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. Derivational bound morpheme (ism) is used in the end of this word and the level of morphological integration is partial. This reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
7. Hijabism,this word came in the Urdu language from the Arabic language (hijab) in 1611. The Urdu language uses this word as a noun. Pakistani English borrowed this word from Urdu language.
/Hijab+ism/=/Hijabism/ The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. This word uses derivational bound morpheme (ism) in the end, and the level of morphological integration is partial. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
8. Desism, this word came in the Urdu language from the Sanskrit language (Desi) in 1700. The Urdu language uses this word as an Adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from Urdu language.
/Desi+ism/=/Desism/ The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. This word uses derivational bound morpheme (ism) in the end, to change its grammatical category. And the level of morphological integration is partial. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.

9.
Pakistani is the Persian language word used as an adjective in Persian language in 1933. The Urdu language uses this word as an Adjective as well. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language.
/Pakistan+i/=/Pakistani/ The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. This word takes derivational bound morpheme (i) in its end, to change the grammatical category, and the level of morphological integration is primary. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing fall in the category of deficit hypothesis.
10. Lahori, a Hindi language word used as an adjective in the Hindi language. The Urdu language uses this word as Adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language.
/Lahore+i/=/Lahori/ elt.ccsenet.org Vol. 13, No. 5;2020 57 The suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. This word takes derivational bound morpheme (i) in its end, to change the grammatical category, and the level of morphological integration is primary. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
11. Punjabi, a Persian language word used as an adjective in the Persian language. The Urdu language uses this word also as an Adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language.
/Punjab+i/=/Punjabi/ The Suffixation process is involved in the morphological integration of this word. This word takes derivational bound morpheme (i) in the end to change the grammatical category, and the level of morphological integration is primary. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in the English language, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
12. Bookie, a Hindi language word uses a as noun in the Urdu language. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in English language there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing falls in the category of deficit hypothesis.
13. Nikkah is an Arabic word and, Ceremony is an English word. Both vocabulary items are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.
14. Janazah is a Persian word and, Prayer is an English word. Both Vocabulary items are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.

Shaadi is a Persian word and
Hall is an English word. Both words are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.
16. Rikshaw is a Japanese word and, Stand is an English word. Both words are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.

Gym is an English word and
Khana is a Persian language word. Both words are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.
18. Chai is a Persian language word, and Studio is an English language word. Both words are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.

19.
Pind is a Punjabi language word, and Road is an English word. Both words are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis.
20. Gora is the Sanskrit language word, and Street is an English word. Both words are the nouns in their respective source languages. Pakistani English uses these two words uniquely as a compound noun, but this is a hybridized compounding. Both words are free lexical morphemes, and by joining them, they make up a new word. The reason for this lexical borrowing is that, in Pakistani English, there was not an equivalent term. Therefore, this lexical borrowing comes under the category of deficient hypothesis. Table 6. Urdu loan word used in Pakistani English without changings 10. Salwar word first used in the Persian language, and it came in the Urdu language in 1697 as a noun. Pakistani English directly borrowed this word, and the reason for this lexical borrowing is the deficit hypothesis. 1. Halal word came in the Urdu language from the Arabic language in 1635. In Urdu language, this word is used as an adjective. Pakistani English borrowed this word from the Urdu language. Pakistani English uses this word as an adjective. The Urdu language directly borrowed this word from the Arabic, and Pakistani English borrowed this word directly form the Urdu language. Now this word is also used in global English as well. The reason for this lexical borrowing is the deficit hypothesis.
2. Bazar word first used in the Persian language, and it came in the Urdu language in 1421 as a noun. Pakistani English directly borrowed this word, and now this word is also used in global English. In global English, there are other similar words, but the reason for this lexical borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.
3. Jungle is the word of the Sanskrit language. It came in the Urdu in 1611 as a noun, and Pakistani English uses this word also as a noun. From Pakistani English, this word is directly borrowed in global English, and the reason for this lexical borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.
4. Moon soon is purely the Urdu language word uses as a noun and adjective in the Urdu language. Global English directly borrowed this word from Pakistani English, and deficit hypothesis became the reason for this lexical borrowing.

5.
Cummerbund word first used in the Persian language, later the Urdu language borrowed it as a noun. Now, the global English also uses this word. In global English, there are other similar words, but the reason for this lexical borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.
6. Cotton is purely the Urdu language word, uses as a noun. The Global English directly borrowed this word from Pakistani English, and deficit hypothesis became the reason for this lexical borrowing.
7. Chita is the Sanskrit language word, it came in the Urdu language in 1503 as a noun and adjective, and Pakistani English uses this word also as a noun and adjective. From Pakistani English, this word is directly borrowed by global English and the reason for this lexical borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.
8. Garam masala is the Arabic and the Persian word. In both languages, this word is used as a noun. The Urdu language directly borrowed this word as a noun. And now, it is also used in the global English and the reason for this borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.

9.
Khaki word first used in the Persian language, and it came in the Urdu language as a noun. Pakistani English directly borrowed this word and now, the global English also uses this word. In global English, there are other similar words, but the reason for this lexical borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.
10. Pajamas word first used in the Persian language, and it came in the Urdu language in 1778 as a noun. Pakistani English directly borrowed this word, and now the global English also uses this word. In global English, there are other similar words, but the reason for this lexical borrowing is the dominance hypothesis.

Morphological Processes used in the Integration of Loan Words
In response to the first research question, the current study reveals that, loan words retain their grammatical category in the Pakistani English. These loan words employed four distinguished morphological processes in their integration into Pakistani English. These four distinguished morphological processes are Suffixation, Hybridization compounding, Direct borrowing and Modification. The results also unveil that the integration of these loan words is gradable. Loan words which used suffixation morphological process were primary and partially integrated into Pakistani English. In suffixation morphological process loan words used both derivational and inflectional bound morphemes of English language in the end. Bound inflectional morpheme (s) is used to form the plural of the particular word. And derivational bound morphemes (i, ism) of English language are used to retain the grammatical category of the loan word in Pakistani English. The loan words which used hybridization compounding process were not integrated at all. Loan words which used direct borrowing morphological process were also not integrated at all. In fact these words became part of the global English and the global English started to use them without any change. Whereas, Loan words which used modification process were totally, partially or primary integrated into Pakistani English. In modification process the loan words integrated their vowels and consonants sound. Even some loan words modified their meaning as well.

Variables Influencing the Morphological Integration of Loan Words
In response to the second research question, the current study reveals that the variable which is affecting the morphological integration of loan words is the deficit hypothesis. The speakers borrow loan words from Urdu and other local languages into Pakistani English, because Pakistani English is lacking in specific area of vocabulary. To fill this linguistics gap the speaker borrow the forms of Urdu language into Pakistani English. In borrowing process, the behavior of the speakers is another very important factor. There are two categories of language behavior of the speakers, negative and positive attitude. In case of Pakistani English, words are borrowed from Urdu and other local languages with positive attitude, because the sole intention behind this borrowing is to fill the linguistics gap, which shows the inadequacy of vocabulary items in Pakistani English. The speakers give a new or acceptable structure to a loan word, to make it sound like English language. Therefore, they use integration process and change the very structure of the particular item according to Pakistani English.
It also came into notice that, some words are borrowed in Pakistani English, because of the influence of the dominance hypothesis. Despite the fact that, those words already exist in English language, but speakers use other forms of Urdu and local languages just to highlight the linguistics appreciation. They users portray competence, modern thoughts, and openness of Urdu language and culture toward English language.
With regard to linguistics variable, the most influential variable is the nature of the loanword. When this question comes, what morphological pattern a specific loan word will use to adjust, or to integrate itself, in a new system of a target language. The answer comes from the structure and the generative tendency of the particular loan word in the target language. Instead of the structure of the loan word, the system of the recipient language is also very significant because the very structure of the recipient language will help to predict the integration and modification of the loan word in the new system of the recipient language. This account establishes the fact that not only the nature of the loan word but also the productive nature of the recipient language is also very significant to predict or to understand the morphological integration of words in any language. It shows the generative and dynamic nature of the recipient language. It has been seen during the analysis, that each word integrates itself according to its tendency and uses a specific morphological pattern to adjust its self in the new environment of Pakistani English.

Conclusion and Recommendations
Therefore, this study concludes that, Pakistani English uses many loan words from Urdu and other local languages. The present investigation only talks about particular morphological attributes found in the fifty selected Urdu loan words. These results have established this fact that loan words are an integral part of Pakistani English, which makes Pakistani English a unique variety of English language. The results also reveal that Pakistani English is catering the needs of its speakers and helping them to perform better in the daily communication. Pakistani English is showing very appreciative attitude not only towards local language but also towards other foreign languages by absorbing their words into its new and supportive environment. This paper helps in understanding and specifying the unique features of morphological processes used in the integration of these selected Urdu loan words. The study is an attempt to fill the contextual research gap. This study suggests to compile the etymological dictionaries of loan words, which include the origin and morphological development of the loan words to increase the interest of the new researchers in this area. Because of the absence of the etymological lexicons, it was hard for the researcher to give unambiguous information about the origin of Urdu loan words used in Pakistani English. Many words of the Pakistani English became part of global English vocabulary, which is a significant characteristic, yet there is no hint of their history and information. This research limits itself to the variables, which are affecting the morphological integration of the loan words in Pakistani English. There is a need to conduct more studies on morphological integration in various different dialects of Pakistani English, to fill this contextual gap.