A New Problem with the Twin Paradox

This paper discusses the “triplet thought experiment” in which accelerated motion is eliminated from the famous twin paradox thought experiment of the special theory of relativity (STR). The author considers the coordinate systems of an inertial frame M and rocket A moving at constant speed relative to each other. First, an observer in inertial frame M performs the triplet thought experiment, and it is confirmed that the delay in time which elapses in the moving system agrees with the predictions of the STR. However, the delay in time predicted by the STR is observed even in the case when an observer A in rocket A carries out the triplet thought experiment. Before starting movement at constant velocity, rocket A experiences accelerated motion. The coordinate system of rocket A cannot be regarded physically as a stationary system. Even so, observer A observes the delay predicted by the STR. If the previous, traditional interpretation is assumed to be correct, observer A will never observe a delay in time agreeing with the predictions of the STR. To avoid paradox, the previously proposed traditional interpretation must be revised.


I. Introduction
Since special relativity was made public, twin paradox has been controversial.
Today it is regarded as settled and is not regarded as a paradox any more. This paper does not disagree with the prediction of special relativity, which predicts that the clock of one of the twins who has made a space travel will have slowed down as compared with the clock of the other of the twins. However, this paper has doubt about the established explanation for the reason of the time dilation.
Thus, let us reconfirm the twin paradox for the sake of the arguments introduced in the next chapters.
Suppose the clocks initially agreeing with each other. If one clock remains at rest in an inertial frame, and the other is taken off on any sort of path and finally brought back to its starting point.
Special relativity predicts that the second clock will have slowed down as compared with the first. In today s parlance, the astronaut will end up by becoming younger than his twin brother.
During the travel the astronaut experiences acceleration and deceleration, and so there is asymmetry between the two coordinates. Therefore, it is thought that we can't regard that one on the earth travels and the other is at rest.
The clock of the astronaut has slowed down. Therefore, we can avoid the impossible condition where both the twins find the other younger than himself.
The explanation regarded as correct is as follows: Since the coordinates of the second clock moving relative to the inertial system make accelerated motion, there exists asymmetry between the two coordinates. It is clearly the second clock that has made a motion, and so the time of the second coordinates delays.
However,in Thought Experiment 2 in the next chapter, this paper will present the example in which this explanation is invalid.

II. Triplet experiment by three observers (Thought Experiment 1) and
another Triplet experiment performed by replacing one observer with another

observer (Thought Experiment 2)
On twin paradox reconfirmed in Introduction, in order to avoid an argument concerning acceleration and deceleration that the astronaut experiences, we should deal with triplet experiments .
In this chapter, therefore, we give a consideration by thought experiment dealing with triplets.

Thought Experiment 1:
Suppose the rocket A moving at the uniform velocity 3c/5 in the plus direction along the x-axis on the earth. (c means light speed) When the observer A in the rocket A passes before the observer M on the earth, observers M and A start their stopwatches W and W A . (See Fig . 1a) Fig. 1a The moment when the observer A in the rocket A passes before the observer M on the earth At this point the two observers start their stopwatches W and WA . The time passes by the watches in this paper is to be obtained applying special relativity. All the figures in this paper, space contraction of a moving object is left out.
After that the rocket A keeps moving. When one second passes by the stopwatch W, the rocket A meets the rocket B moving from ahead. (See Fig . 1b At this moment, the observer A in the rocket A stops his stopwatch W A and the observer B in the rocket B starts his stopwatch W B . Note that the velocity of the rocket B relative to the observer M is -3c/5.

Suppose the time that has passed by W A is t A ′and the time that has passed by W is t,
we can get the following value from special relativity.
Substituting 3c/5 for v, and 1 for t in Eq.(II . 1), we get: On the other hand, the rocket B keeps moving. When the rocket B passes before the During this time, the time t which has passed by the watch W is 2(sec.).
Meanwhile, the time t B ′, which has passed by watch W B is equal to t A ′, i.e., 4/5(sec.).
From these values, the relationship between t, t A ′and t B ′is: t:t A ′:t B ′ = 2:4/5:4/5 (II . 3) Expressing this relationship in another form, we get: According to special relativity, the total amount of time which has passed in the rocket A and B is smaller than the time which has passed on the earth.
From these prediction, special relativity concludes that the time in the rocket A and B passes later than the time passing on the earth.
That is, in the coordinates in triplets dealt with in Thought Experiment 1, the rest system is the coordinates on the earth, and the motion system is the coordinates of the rockets A and B.

Thought Experiment 2:
In place of the rocket B, we introduce the rocket C moving at a different velocity from that of the rocket B.
As in Thought Experiment 1, however, when the observer A in the rocket A passes before the observer on the earth at the velocity 3c/5, the two observers start their watches W and W A . (See Fig. 1a) When the time t by the watch W is 4/5(sec.), the rocket C passes before the observer The velocity v′is the velocity of the rocket C approaching the observer A in the rocket A at the speed 3c/5.
Next we will get the velocity of the rocket C(v′) seen from the observer M.
According to the addition theorem of the velocities by special relativity, we get: Substituting 3c/5 for v 1 and v 2 , we get: v′=15c/17 (II . 6) After that the rocket C keeps moving. When the rocket C catches up with the rocket A, the observer A and the observer C(in the rocket C) stop their watches W A and W C .
(See Fig. 2b Fig. 2b The moment when the rocket C catches up the rocket A At this point the observers A and C stop their watches. According to special relativity, the velocity 15c/17 of the rocket C means that the rocket C approaches the rocket A at the speed 3c/5.
Then the observer A compares the time t A ′which has passed by his watch with the time t which has passed on the earth, and with the t C ′which has passed in the rocket C.
In order to get the values t A ′and t C ′, we first get the values t A and t C as defined below: Suppose the following: When the time t A ′passes by the watch W A , the time t A passes by the watch W. When the time t C ′passes by the watch W C , the time t C passes by the watch W.
At this point we can get two equations below: Substituting t C in Eq. (II . 7) for t C in Eq. (II . 8), and 3c/5 for v, the value in (II . 6) for v′, we get: From Eq.(II. 7), we get: t C = 17/10 (sec.) (II . 10) Therefore, the time t A ′which passed by the watch W A is: Here, substituting 4/5(obtained from Eq.(II. 2) ) for -1 , and the value of (II . 9) for t A , we get: Meanwhile, the time t C ′which has passed by the watch W C is: Here, we get: ′ -1 = (1-v′ 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 (II . 14) Substituting the value of Eq.(II. 6) for v′in Eq.(II . 14), we get: Expressing the relationship in another way, we get:  Fig. 3 The case in which Thought Experiment 2 is seen from the observer A in the rocket A As is clear from this figure, Thought Experiment 2 corresponds to the case in which the observer A in the rocket A performs Thought Experiment 1(triplet experiment) regarding himself as the rest system . Further, we can find the coordinates of the earth in Thought Experiment 2 (Fig. 3) corresponds to those of the rocket A in Thought Experiment 1. In the same way, the coordinates of the rocket C corresponds to those of the rocket B. (See Chart 1) Thought Experiment 1 (Fig.1) Thought Experiment 2 (Fig.3 Motion System Rocket C Velocity:-3c/5 Chart 1. Rest system and motion system in Thought Experiment 1 (Fig. 1) and Thought Experiment 2 (Fig. 3) If the three coordinates in Thought Experiment 2 are seen from the viewpoint of whether or not accelerated motion existed in the past, the rest system is the coordinates of the earth, while the motion system is the coordinates of the rocket A and C.
However, when they are seen from the viewpoints of time dilation, the rest system is the coordinates of the rocket A, while the motion system is the coordinates of the earth and the rocket C.
In Thought Experiment 2, it is judged that the time which passes by the stopwatch on the earth delays relative to the time which passes in the coordinates of the rocket A. However, the earth didn't make the accelerated motion relative to the rocket A.
Meanwhile, the coordinates of the rocket A is judged as the rest system although it performed the accelerated motion relative to the earth.
Then, what will happen if we introduce the coordinates of the rocket M( moving at uniform speed relative to the earth) and perform the same experiments as Thought Experiment 1 and 2?(Imagine by replacing the earth with the rocket M in Fig.1, 2 and 3) We will call those thought experiments Thought Experiment 1′and 2′, which correspond to Thought Experiment 1 and 2.
In Thought Experiment 1′, where the observer in the rocket M performs, it is judged that the time which passes in the coordinates of the rocket A and B delays relative to the time which passes in the coordinates of the rocket M.
From this, the observer in the rocket M regards his coordinates as the rest system , while he regards the coordinates of the rocket A and B as the motion system .
Meanwhile, in Thought Experiment 2′, where the observer in the rocket A performs, it is judged that the time which passes in the coordinates of the rocket M and C delays relative to the time which passes in the coordinates of the rocket A.
From this, the observer in the rocket A regards his coordinates as the rest system , while he regards the coordinates of the rocket M and C as the motion system .
By the way, in order to perform Thought Experiment 1′and 2′by introducing the coordinates of the rocket M in place of those of the earth, the rocket M, A, B and C have to make accelerated motion beforehand, and reach the velocity which is fast enough for thought experiments to be performed.
In Thought Experiment 1′and 2′, the coordinates of the four rockets are equal in the sense that they made accelerated motion relative to the earth. There is no asymmetry among the four coordinates.
That is to say, there exists coordinates with time dilation even though all the coordinates are in accelerated motion and no asymmetry exists.
From this, we have found that there is a condition where the explanation proposed in the Introduction Accelerated motion made by the coordinates of the second stopwatch brings about the asymmetry, therefore the time of the coordinates of the second stopwatch which made motion delays. can not be applied. Therefore, we have reached the conclusion that, on twin paradox a different explanation from the conventional one is needed.