Astronomical Constants and Universal Code in Holy Book

At the beginning of 1995, I was looking to produce a new concept of the Astronomical Period (AP) which may be determined by the shortest period of Lunar years which this period includes leap years and common years, just to get a simple formula for calculating the average length of the lunar year where I finally deduced the first formula about this average by using the simple math (the four elementary arithmetic operations). By this rule, I methodically educed what I essentially considered it as an acceptable consequence which, indeed, encouraged me to do more research about the best resources that required to deal with the concept of (AP) where I found something like the hidden signals in Islamic Holy Book (The Great Qur’an) which led me by the elicitation method to get the perfect astronomical constants besides of an evolving conclusion about what I considered it as a scientific guide to the universal code. What the exiting in this research is: these (perfect astronomical constants) had successfully passed the test of three physical laws in motion which means that the hypothesis of this research (elicitation method) is not arbitrary, and the conclusions of this research had truly deduced by innovative scientific basis.


Introduction
If you observed the motion of Moon regarding to Earth's motion around the Sun with respect to fixed star, you will find that we have a specific period that is formed by the shortest AP which equals 19 Lunar years. And then we know that this period has two types of years: Leap Lunar year equals 355 days, and the common Lunar year equals 354 days, and when I tried to find any resources that confirm this observation by anyway, I found the Great Qur'an (Note 1) had mentioned the word of (year) in specific arrangement; seven times as singular form (year) and twelve times as plural form (years). Then I tried to use these details to figure out the average length of the Then, by substitution, I got the first astronomical constant, as follows: When I tried to compare this result with Synodical lunar year (which equals 29.530588 days (Note 2) × 12 months = 354.367056 ) (Note 3), I found that the difference is less than two minutes; 354.368421 − 354.367056 = 0.001365 = 1.9656 .

Purpose of This Research
In this research, I try to get the answers for these questions, scientifically: a) Do we have an acceptable scientific resource, outside of the usual scientific resources, to get the scientific data or astronomical constants? b) Can we use the elicitation method to get the perfect scientific data? c) Can we refer to holy books to formulate physical equations?

Research Hypothesis
I will depend on the elicitation method (Note 4) to reach out to the perfect astronomical constants from The Great Qur'an, and try to test these constants on the basic physical laws in motion.

The Difficult Mission
My mission in this research is: how can I find out the average length of the Solar year ( ) as I found out the ( ) before? Because this constant will become the best key to go further in the hypothesis of this research.
2) Using the Astrophysical constant which is not meeting the purpose of this research.
3) Referring to the Holy Book (The Great Qur'an) and try to find out if there is an accurate constant or not.
Indeed, when I referred to The Great Qur'an (Note 5), I found that the word of (year) or (years) had been mentioned in 16 different chapters (Soras) within 19 verses had been labeled by specific serial numbers that may be arranged in specific forms (Note 6) to keep something like a secret in its relationships together. See Table-1 where I tried to use these relations to get what I assumed as the difference by the minutes (∆ ) between Lunar day and Solar day by using the following formula: Year 29 th (Al-`Ankabut) 14 Years 30 th (Ar-Rum) 4 Year 32 nd (As-Sajdah) 5 Year 46 th (Al-'Ahqaf) 15 Year 70  ) by using the following formula: By substitution, (∆ ) becomes available, as follows: apr.ccsenet.org Vol. 12, No. 4;2020 You note that I used the total minutes of one day (1440 ) to convert those minutes to a day, and I used the total days (6733) of the shortest astronomical period ( ) which equals 19 years, to find (∆ ) as shown in Eq (3) which is more accurate than other predictions (Note 7). Now, I can use this result to find out the average length of the solar year, as follows: Then, when you initially compare these results with astronomical constants, we find that; − = 1.9656 , − = 25.4736 , and you'll finally find that these data are examinable, as I will show you soon. But before that, let me refer you to Table-2 just to check how much the hypothesis of this research is running well or not, it is acceptable or not, or how much it is accurate or not? Hence, I think, it is the best way to check these results by referring to these laws; Earth's orbit = 2 , and the velocity law ( = ), where we find that the Earth's orbital speed by using ( ) Anyway, if you have any fractions in any result of these transformations, just pay attention to do the following: a) If the fraction less than 50%, just remove it from the result. b) If the fraction more than 50%, make it as (+1) and add it to the result. c) The accurate result depends on the full perfect results of Eqs (1-4).

Mysterious Code
Maybe these transformations seem as universal symphony, especially when we try to apply it for more than forty thousand years as shown in figure-2 or Table-3 where we have some consequences worth to focus on it, like: a) The solar calendar still bigger than the lunar calendar until a specific date (20800 A.C) which this date is the end of first Great Astronomical Period ( ). b) When the first ( ) is completed, the solar and the lunar calendars are shown as the same (become equaled). c) After that date (20800 A.C), the lunar calendar is going to be bigger and bigger than the solar calendar. d) The difference between the solar calendar and the lunar calendar seems as harmonious pulse as shown in column (D) of Table 3. e) The relationship between the solar and the lunar calendars still harmonious until 41000 A.C. Compare Figure 1 with Figure 2 where the present time is the best examine of these transformations; these two calendars have different starting, different time intervals, but they have the same shared point which is the present time (Now). Synchronization is an important scientific measurement in this case. See Figure 3. f) The surprise appears suddenly as a missed period when these calendars cross the second great AP (41600 A.C). g) But, when I tried to apply these transformations for a long period of these calendars, I found some conclusions as shown in Table-3, where it led me to what I considered as a coding language or mysterious code. Note; by using transformation (6) I show you how solar calendar and Lunar calendar are going together ( ≡ ) along the time where column (C) shows you the differences between these calendars ( − = ; 1000 − 390 = 610), but if we want to see the average of the changes on column (C) I deduct the initial ( ) from the updated ( ′); (610 − 580 = 031) to get some results, like: (030, 031, …etc) which seem along of column (D) as universal pulses where this way is applied in the last column ( ); ( = − ') also, to discover what I considered as a mysterious code; (000,000,000,000,001,001,000,000,001, 001, 000, 000, 001, 001, 000, 000, 000 …….etc). Eventually, if we can scientifically imagine this real and strong relationship between the Hijri calendar and the Lunar calendar along the Solar calendar, then we are strongly invited to study that curve of the Hijri calendar as a reflection of Lunar calendar along the Solar calendar, to get more knowledge about our universe. See Figure 3 where we have to remember that: a) These three calendars had not started together, but they are together, crossing the present time (now), at the same time.
b) The missed period seems like a confusing era, when this era has (1000 = 2294 ) which is impossible, depending on the transformations of this research, because these transformations said that: (1000 = 1031 1030 ) which means that these transformations had predicted that we have something unusual when the second (GAP) will be completed. c) The difficult mission is made by concluding the synchronization of the three calendars, and foresight the outlook of our galaxy, at least.

Conclusion
In this research the elicitation method had scientifically proved: a) The accurate constants of the length of Lunar day, Lunar year, Solar day, Solar year and the difference between Solar and Lunar year as shown in Eqs (1-4). b) Perfect astronomical transformations as shown in Eqs (5)(6). c) Other consequences as shown in Table 3 like; universal pulses (shown in column D) and mysterious code (shown in column E). d) The missed period as shown in Figures 2, 3 and Table 3.